MD chart in 十勝沖 (Tokachi offshore region)
Wednesday, June 11, 2025
Dragon chart in 十勝沖
Dragon chart in 十勝沖 (Tokachi offshore region)
These plots seem to be random at first glance. There are some plots a straight line (orange lines). For example, the combinations of 60km/1km/130km/90km/120km, 20km/70km/30km(=M7.1), 50km/40km/60km, 50km/70km/80km,and 80km/130km/140km are in a straight line.Monday, June 9, 2025
Counts of occurrence per depth in 釧路沖
Counts of occurrence per depth in 釧路沖 (Kushiro offshore region) is shown as below graph,
Though 1km is the 1st count curve, after the longest silent term, no occurrence. M8.2 of 50km occurred around the quintet junction of 50km / 40km / 20km / 60km / 10km in 1952. M8.2 of 50km kept most of potential until M8.0 of 50km in 2003. On the other hand, M7.5 of 100km was caused by the quartet junction of 10km/70km/80km/100km in 1993. 50km curve has the steep slope. So, 50km may catch up with 1km in future. It may cause of the domino reaction with other(s).
- 1km(red)…This count is the 1st. But, the longest silent term is continuing since 1994 after the 2nd longest one between 1980-1994. The rapid increase was just after M8.2 of 50km in 1952. The M8.2 of 50km is the greatest magnitude of all depths. The largest magnitude of 1km is M6.9 in 1935.
- 50km(light blue)…This count is the 2nd. As described above, The greatest magnitude of 50km is M8.2 in 1952. The M8.2 was occurred around the quintet junction of the curves among 50km/40km/20km/60km/10km. After the M8.2, the count was accelerated by M7.2, and caught and overtook 40km around 1968. Since it, 50km/40km curves almost overlapped each other. M8.0 of 50km in 2003 seems to be the result of the combined earthquakes of 50km/40km kept the most energy of M8.2 in 1952. The curve is keeping the large slope. So, 50km may catch with 1km in future.
- 40km(green)…This count is the 3rd. The greatest magnitude is M7.4 in 1973. The M7.4 caused not only the combined rapid increases of 40km/50km, but also 30km/20km's ones as the aftershocks. The overlapped of 40km/50km almost continued until M8.0 of 50km in 2003. After it, 50km was accelerated by M7.1 of 50km in 2004. So, 40km curve lagged behind from 50km.
- 60km(blue)…This count is the 4th. The curve shows the similar pattern with 50km with low level. In recent years, it almost overlapped with 30km. There were 2 major rapid increases by M7.4 of 40km in 1973/M8.0 of 50km in 2003. The largest magnitude is M7.1 in 2008.
- 30km(yellow green)…This count is the 5th.The curve followed 60km. But, after M8.0 of 50km in 2003, the increase becomes slow down. The pattern of 30km/50km after the M8.0 resembles with the one of 40km/50km. The largest magnitude is M7.1 in 2008 after the slow down.
- 20km(orange)…This count is the 6th. There was the entanglement among 10km/20km/30km/60km after M7.2 of 50km in 1961, and separated from each other after M7.4 of 40km in 1973. Later, 20km/10km had the longer silent terms including the longest silent term. Recently, the curve slopes of them have become steep a little bit. It might be the sign of more activity of them than before. The largest magnitude is M6.2 in 1921.
- 70km(purple)…This count is the 6th. 70km/80km curves were overtaking and being overtaken each other. 100km curve joined the entanglement of them after M7.5 of 100km in 1993 until about M7.1 of 30km in 2008. 70km curve become more steep, and caught up with 20km around in 2000. The largest magnitude is M6.3 in 1927.
- 80km(navy)/100km(gray)…The count is the 7th/8th. After the entanglement among 70km/80km/100km after M7.5 of 100km in 1993, 80km / 100km curves are still overlapped each other. The largest magnitude is M6.5 in 1949(80km)/M7.5 in 1993 (100km).
- 90km(brown)…This count is the 9th. The the largest magnitude is M6.3 in 1953.
- 10km(yellow)…This count is the 10th. The the largest magnitude is M7.1 in 2008. Because of these values, the potential seems to be high even the low ranking.
- others…omitted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
統計熱力学と構造幾何学に基づく日本海溝セグメント応力スキャンモデル~アスペリティの空間連結見通しエネルギー飽和度に基づく連鎖破断および停止境界の検証~
件名について、GEMINI(NotebookLM)にて資料作成したが、要修正や説明不足があり、以下に補足の説明を補足した。 表紙 本解析は気象庁有感地震データベースのデータに基づき、幾何的・熱力学的解析を実施したものであり、その解析自体は気象庁の公式発表や見解とは関係のない独立し...
-
Counts of occurrence per depth MD-T chart in 神奈川県 (Kanagawa Pref.) is shown as below graph, The greatest one of this area is M7.9 Great K...
-
[背景] 気象庁の有感地震全データを東経北緯を0.1度単位深さを1km単位のグリッドに分けた場合、M7以上の震源、かつ段数2段目あるいは3段目以上のグリッド震源は12震源しか存在せず、12の特異震源と呼んでいる。その中の発生順で6番目の茨城県沖の震源#SP12-6に関連して、...
-
[概要] 2つの特異震源を含む日向灘周辺のM6.6以上の震源推移がこれまでの壱岐・隠岐と北伊豆地震#SP12-1の解析同様の逆時計周りの推移と途中からの時計周りを示しており、日向灘での次のM7以上の震源が2つの特異震源を結ぶ線上で発生、南海トラフ地震のトリガーとなる可能性を示し...






